I/O: Tech Introvert - Keep your eyes open and your mouth shut...

The Beatles: Digital Please or it Didn't Happen

Much to my wife's chagrin, I'm a Beatles man. This trait was passed down from my mother's side of the family who were avid Beatles fans. "Get Back" was one of the first songs I remember as a child, and I distinctly recall believing the words to Wings "Lie and Let Die" were "Little Wet Dime".

Surprisingly to this point, I only own a couple of Beatles records. I just never got around to buying them, and now that I never under any circumstances buy actual physical CDs, I likely never will. This is why I'm requesting the powers that be to please release the Beatles catalog in digital format. Preferably on iTunes, say...tomorrow. Please allow me to give you my money. Otherwise I may be tempted to look for the digital version elsewhere...

Pictured above: Ringo's outfit = purified awesome.

WTF is wrong with you people update:
“Conversations between Apple and EMI are ongoing and we look forward to the day when we can make the music available digitally. But it’s not tomorrow,” Ernesto Schmitt, EMI’s global catalog  president, told the FT’s Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson. [FT]

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Apple   Beatles   iTunes  

Comments [0]

Beautiful Day in Boston

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Boston  

Comments [0]

Mint vs. Citizens: Who Ya Got?

money-fight

It’s no secret that I’ve been in absolute lather for the past couple of weeks over the sudden and unexplained connectivity problems I’ve experienced with Mint.com. On Aug. 23, Mint stopped refreshing my Citizens Bank accounts. While it’s incredibly easy to stay within one’s budget when no money ever comes in or out, this issue rendering their service completely useless.

I’ve had my go-round with Citizens in the past. It took 2 months and 2 “lost” cards before the new bank card that I ordered arrived. Then there was the 3 phone calls to change my address, 2 of which were related to a backwards zip code. You read that right- they somehow managed to enter my zip code backwards…twice. But in desperation I signed up for a Quicken Online account and voila, it worked like a charm. So I had this one all on Mint, and I was pissed.

Mint didn’t make it easy on themselves. Days passed with no word from support. (Here’s a tip- how about putting some of those fat funding rounds towards customer support?). I had all but given up, and had started to gift wrap a turd-in-a-box to ship directly to Mintland headquarters when this little gem appeared on the Mint forums:

Hi Citizens Bank Minters,
It appears Citizens, www.citizensbankonline.com , is now actively and purposefully blocking Mint.com from connecting. This has been happening for over a week now. We apologize for the frustration and we’re trying to work to a resolution at this time. We’ll post here with any status updates as they are available.
Thanks for your patience while we try to find a way to connect successfully.

If this is true, there had better be a damn good reason for it. Like, Citizens engineers discovered a critical flaw in the Mint data provider. Or Al Qaida were using Mint’s brilliant budgeting tools to handle their finances. Or just a big misunderstanding. Because whichever company is in the wrong here is getting a nice new turd-in-a-box sent their way.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Citizens Bank   Mint   mint.com  

Comments [0]

Dear Mint.com: Please Fix This

I've embraced your amazingly free service and I love it. Anyone who is not using Mint.com is a silly goose. I only have a single request, and it's a small one. It doesn't involve powerful accounting tools, complex statistical analysis or slick sexy charts. All I want is to not see the above graphic every other day. Please crank up the priority up a notch or two. I'll gladly pay for it.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Mint   mint.com  

Comments [0]

Lifetick: Goal-based Task Management Made Sexy

A while back I confessed to being a victim of fragmented knowledge. At any given moment, there are a hundred different things I want to do and learn. Due to this "learning ADD" it's very easy to lose focus which results in learning/accomplishing little tiny, useless bits of everything. The basement is 1/2 finished, I've gotten through 20% of 3 different books, I can write a little JavaScript but not particularly well, etc. So a few months ago I decided to do something about it. I searched online for tools I could use to create and organize an action plan. Once I could organize and prioritize exactly what I wanted to do, executing on it would be significantly easier. One incredibly useful tool I came across was Lifetick.

Lifetick is an online goal-setting service which is different than many other personal productivity and task list tools out there (like Remember The Milk). What sets it apart is that Lifetick is goal-based. The workflow begins with defining core values you want to work on, like "House, Marriage, Finances, Dev Skills" etc. Once those are in place, you create Goals which are composed of tasks. A goal is simply something you want to achieve, and tasks are the steps required to achieve that goal. For example, I have 2 goals listed below which fall under my House core value: "Summer Home Improvement" and "Fix Up Basement". As you can see, I'm a little behind on the basement...

 

Attaching dates, priority and email reminders to these tasks makes it easy to plan and execute on things you want to accomplish. Lifetick also has a nice web interface which provides some slick widgets for high-level progress tracking. As a matter of fact, the Lifetick UI is hot- easily one of the best features and a joy to use (unlike other services...I'm looking at you, Remember the Milk). Not to mention a pleasant iPhone-enabled site. The free version allows you to track up to 3 goals at once, which is enough to get to know the service. Paid accounts are a scant $20 a year and offer unlimited goals.

I've been using Lifetick for a couple of months now, and I really like it so far. It's already helped me to achieve a couple of goals I've been spinning on. There are a couple of limitations with the service- including more Evernote-esque functionality like web clippings, URLs, etc. to tasks would be a huge help. Also supporting an email protocol would also be great. But Lifetick shows a lot of potential and I hope they keep growing as a service.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Zune HD Would Have Been Huge in 2006


The lickable hotness of the Zune HD cannot be denied. But to be a successful gadget, you've got to bring more to the table than just hotness. You've got to give people a reason to cough up the cash. From the Zune HD press release:

  • Built-in HD Radio™ receiver. Allows you to listen to higher-quality sound than is available from traditional radio channels, as well as access additional programming through HD2 and HD3 multicast channels from many of your favorite local FM radio stations at no extra cost.
  • HD video output capabilities. Supports HD video playback from the device through a premium HDMI A/V docking station (sold separately) directly to an HDTV in 720p, making it easy to enjoy better-than-DVD-quality video on your own big screen at home.
  • OLED touch screen. Allows you to easily flip through music, movies and other content. The 3.3-inch glass screen and 16:9 widescreen format display (480x272 resolution) offer a premium viewing experience.
  • Built-in Wi-Fi. Allows for browsing, streaming or downloading new music from Zune Marketplace.
  • Internet browser. Full-screen Web browsing, optimized for the multitouch screen with zoom-in and zoom-out gestures.
  • Accessories, at home and on the road. Zune HD and AV Dock charges and syncs players while playing supported 720p HD videos on HDTVs. Play HD Radio, music and podcasts from your Zune HD device through your car stereo using the Zune Premium Car Pack.
Sick display, WiFi, Web Browser, online music store, built-in radio. A device like this would have ruled the world, selling millions of units and ending up stealing back a huge chunk of media player market share for Microsoft...in 2006. That's ~ 1 year before Apple released it's first iPod Touch and changed mobile media devices forever. 

Sure with Zune's bad ass Nvidia Tegra processor, the screen is going to dampen any geek who lays eyes upon it. But what's the point? Downloadable band photos? Zune's video store is horrific, and watching old episodes of Monk on your OLED screen or via HDMI won't change that. Unless Microsoft has something up it's sleeve, like an exclusive Netflix streaming deal or Flash browser support, I don't see a compelling reason to buy a Zune HD. Apple's devices currently do things like provide GPS driving directions, manage my budget, create spreadsheets and stream live NY Yankee games. And if I ask them to slum it, they'll even lower themselves to simply playing audio + video. Given the choice, which would you spend your money on?

HD radio? People actually still listen to radio with services like Pandora, Last.FM, Spotify out there? Really??

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   iPhone   iPod Touch   Media Players   Zune HD  

Comments [0]

Songbird Throws In the Towel


I've been a longtime user of Songbird, the free media player built on Mozilla technology. The player made some great strides over the past couple of years, packing in features and actually appearing to be a valid alternative to iTunes. That changed today as a blog post revealed that Songbird was open-sourcing their iPod Device Support Add-on, essentially cutting off official support for the most popular media devices in the world.

"Given our limited resources, we’ve decided to support iTunes Import/Export with our own development time, while opening the source to our iPod add-on to the community so other developers can extend and enhance it"... 
"This also means QA won’t be testing against iPods anymore so we’ll need your support to help keep us in the loop on what’s working and what’s not."

And that's pretty much that as far as Songbird becoming an iTunes-killer. And I've run out of reasons to keep it installed, which makes me sad. But I don't blame the Songbird guys. Attempting to integrate with or develop against anything Apple produces is an exercise in futility. Maybe the open-source nerds will be able to run with this thing and Songbird will thrive. One thing is for sure, iTunes isn't going anywhere. For now.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   iPod Touch   iTunes   Songbird  

Comments [0]

The Apple Tablet is Going to Melt Faces


The buzz around the rumored Apple tablet grows by the day, but overall reaction has been mixed. Many are anticipating that it will end in disaster, just as many other ventures into tablet computing have. I think the world is ready for a tablet, and Apple is in the perfect position to deliver yet another life-changing device.

The iPhone isn't a Phone Anymore
At some point, many iPhone and iPod Touch owners realize that the primary function of their device has become secondary; where the amount of time using their device as a computer begins to dwarf the amount of time using it as a phone or media player. This is the prime explanation why millions of people have gleefully allowed AT&T to ruin their phone calls for years without ditching their iPhone. We simply don't care about the phone part as much. I reached this point some time ago with my iPod Touch. I spend a few hours each week listening to my music library, but a few hours each day doing other things. Checking email, browsing the web, reading an ebook, calculating a budget, booking a flight, listening to web radio...last night I watched the Yankees game live on my goddamn iPod. The iPhone is no longer a phone, it's a computer of sorts. That's how people are using them. So the iPhone OS is already proven as a valid (and popular) app platform.

The iTablet as the Ultimate Media Device
Let me know if this sounds familiar- I have a MacBook and a PC laptop packed TO THE GILLS with pricey software. They sit idle each night as more and more of my daily tasks are accommodated by my iPod Touch. I can grab the Touch and in a few clicks get the information I need. The only times I fire up a laptop are:
  1. When I need more screen real estate.
  2. When I need to view Flash.
  3. When I need more computing power or better I/O.
The Apple tablet can eliminate #1 and #2, but it can't compete with #3. And it shouldn't even try. The iTablet shouldn't try to be a "MacBook with a touchscreen". Instead it should just keep pushing in the current iPhone OS direction, with focus on making it the ultimate media device. The lack of computing power problem will gradually be solved by the cloud.

The Cloud Makes the Tablet Relevant
Add the cloud to the tablet and, as Satchmo used to say, "you has Jazz". Yesterday I used my iPod to work on my budget spreadsheet in Google Docs. Again, I used my media player with it's 3.5 inch display to work on a spreadsheet. And it wasn't an unpleasant experience. That's a testament to Google's web apps, and also highlights the point that as web apps becoming more powerful the need for computing power becomes less important. Sure, I'll still grab the laptop if I need dev tools to get my job done. But since more and more of my daily tasks are being shifted to the web, a tablet makes more sense now than it has in the past. This trend will continue.

So Why Not Use a Netbook?
Sex appeal. Packing the Apple Tablet with media-centric features and a big, glorious display is going to blow any netbook experience away. Can you imagine sitting on the commuter train streaming Netflix on this thing? Or flipping full-color pages of Newsweek on your flat panel tablet as people look at you like you're from the effing future? Game over, man. This thing will sell. The only way the Apple Tablet bombs is if Apple tries to cram OS X in there and make it a netbook.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Apple   Apple Tablet   iPhone   iPhone OS   iPod Touch  

Comments [0]

New Firefox Mock-ups Echo A Trend: Light is Right


Ask people what they think of the Google Chrome browser and you'll often hear the remark "it just feels faster". Testing results so indeed prove that Chrome is a fast browser, but the differences become more difficult to measure when compared to other fast browsers like Firefox or Safari. We're talking fractions of a second. So what is it about Chrome that makes it "feel faster"? The answer is obvious- an ingenious UI design. Speed, or at least the illusion of speed, is becoming increasingly important for web-related apps.

Chrome "feels faster" because of its light UI design. Instead of being modeled after a physical window with thick outer borders and deep edges as was common in older browser designs, Chrome is modeled after a sheet of paper. Thin edges, light 2D borders and use of white + blue colors contribute to the illusion of a slick speedy UI. You can experience this for yourself with Firefox- switch between the Default theme and a Chrome-esque theme like Chromifox Basic, and you can't help but feel the latter is faster.

You can see this design theme popping up everywhere. Google is naturally most famous for this design approach, and it can be seen in nearly all of their web apps. Many social services like Tumblr, Twitter and Ping.FM have gone with light, easy to consume 2D themes. Now Mozilla seems to be experimenting with it as well in the next version of Firefox. It's even spilling over to the desktop, which can be seen with Microsoft Windows 7 themes and many Adobe Air apps. People no longer want thick blocky interfaces packed with features/buttons/options. Light, thin and speedy is the new hotness. It's amazing how much perceived application performance mileage you can get out of simple UI design decisions.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Stop Dotting All of Your Twitter Replies

There are many public Twitter Do’s + Don’t out there, but here’s one that many of those lists miss: dotting every one of your Twitter replies is an irritating and egotistical habit. So stop it.

 

For those unaware of what dotting is- Not long ago, Twitter introduced functionality that hides any replies (messages beginning with @username) in your stream which are addressed to users you don’t follow. Since the context of these conversations is usually missing rendering the reply meaningless, it made sense. It was controversial as many people felt it removed a level of discovery. So to work around it, many people add a “.” at the beginning of their replies. This circumvents the filter and makes the reply visible to everyone.


I don’t have a problem with this. If the reply contains useful info which others may be interested in, then it’s fine to broadcast it. What I dislike is how some people use it for nearly every effing reply they send. It’s similar to raising your voice in a conversation to be purposefully overheard by others. It’s obnoxious, narcissistic...and if I still don't know the context then it can be utterly meaningless. Observe:


".@techintrovert You might think that, but sometimes it's best to unlean before one can learn."


WTF am I supposed to make of this little gem of Yoda-esque knowledge? It's a perfect example of why excessive dotting can get old quickly. So please- use it in moderation. Carefully dole out those dot replies as you would carefully dole out a retweet. We don’t need to know what you think about everything all the time.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]